mirror of
https://github.com/jgthms/bulma
synced 2026-03-15 02:04:29 -07:00
Fix website transfer includes
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,10 +56,8 @@ bootstrap:
|
||||
content: "Bulma has introduced some support for accessibility, but Bootstrap has strong and pervasive compatibility with **WCAG 2.0** guidelines."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
{% include global/navbar.html id="AlternativeToBootstrap" %}
|
||||
|
||||
{%
|
||||
include components/hero.html
|
||||
include docs/components/hero.html
|
||||
color="bootstrap"
|
||||
icon="fas fa-exchange-alt"
|
||||
title="Bulma: an **alternative** to Bootstrap"
|
||||
@@ -67,7 +65,7 @@ bootstrap:
|
||||
%}
|
||||
|
||||
{%
|
||||
include components/call.html
|
||||
include docs/components/call.html
|
||||
color="primary"
|
||||
text='Both Bulma and Bootstrap are <strong>CSS frameworks</strong> that allow developers to quickly <strong>build web interfaces</strong> with ease. While they have fairly similar features, they still differ in some ways, and you might wonder why you should choose one framework over the other. This page is here to help answer that.'
|
||||
%}
|
||||
@@ -85,7 +83,7 @@ bootstrap:
|
||||
<div class="bd-pros-list">
|
||||
{% for pro in page.bulma %}
|
||||
{%
|
||||
include content/pro.html
|
||||
include docs/content/pro.html
|
||||
type=pro.type
|
||||
icon=pro.icon
|
||||
icon_brand=pro.icon_brand
|
||||
@@ -106,7 +104,7 @@ bootstrap:
|
||||
<div class="bd-pros-list">
|
||||
{% for pro in page.bootstrap %}
|
||||
{%
|
||||
include content/pro.html
|
||||
include docs/content/pro.html
|
||||
type=pro.type
|
||||
icon=pro.icon
|
||||
icon_brand=pro.icon_brand
|
||||
@@ -142,7 +140,7 @@ bootstrap:
|
||||
</tr>
|
||||
</tfoot>
|
||||
<tbody>
|
||||
{% include content/comparison.html %}
|
||||
{% include docs/content/comparison.html %}
|
||||
</tbody>
|
||||
</table>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user