From 544db84ea9b153c3f45f29ed9c277939b5c287f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sunny Walker Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 09:48:27 -1000 Subject: [PATCH] add Accessibility section for Bootstrap MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit It looks like Bulma's accessibility profile is very slowly improving but will never (unless given infinite timeline) match that of Bootstrap’s. For those of us that are legally required to meet a11y guidelines (US Government/Education), this is an important point that should be highlighted. --- docs/alternative-to-bootstrap.html | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/docs/alternative-to-bootstrap.html b/docs/alternative-to-bootstrap.html index c431d86a..18ce2bd8 100644 --- a/docs/alternative-to-bootstrap.html +++ b/docs/alternative-to-bootstrap.html @@ -50,6 +50,10 @@ bootstrap: icon: "list" title: "Additional elements" content: "Bootstrap has some **elements** like [list group](https://getbootstrap.com/components/#list-group), [wells](https://getbootstrap.com/components/#wells), or [page header](https://getbootstrap.com/components/#page-header) that Bulma doesn't have." +- type: "bootstrap" + icon: "universal-access" + title: "Accessibility" + content: "Bulma has introduced some support for accessibility, but Bootstrap has strong and pervasive compatibility with **WCAG 2.0** guidelines." ---